HR1100 Discussion Post 2, Fall 2019


Question 1. What industrial relations strategy towards unions has WestJet adopted? Explain which practices point to this strategy and which practices do not seem entirely consistent with this strategy.
Originally, WestJet had taken a proactive approach toward unions. They utilized the union substitution/avoidance strategy, or, to “remain union free in situations where workers are not yet unionized.” They had a non-union representation system established. While they appeared to offer union-level pay and benefits and many of the perks and compensation usual of unionized workforces, it turns out that many employees were unhappy with the arrangement. The CEO’s vision of being employee-centric was largely philosophical, so from an outsider’s perspective it would look as if WestJet was succeeding in keeping employees happy while out of union. However, many of their practices contradicted this strategy, such as paying salaries considerably below industry averages.
While WestJet promised to keep employees satisfied and well-taken care of (presumably so that they didn’t unionize), this approach only lasted until about August of 2018. They did manage to stay union free for almost 20 years. However, many WestJet employees grew unhappy with their contracts and the various decisions that were being made that impacted their lives.
Question 2. What factors affected WestJet’s decision regarding which industrial relations strategy to adopt?
Clive Beddoe had a vision for a low-fare, no-frills airline company. This mission likely shaped the decisions regarding IR strategies. Keeping costs low was an important economical consideration in order to keep fees low for customers. Unions tend to drive up the operating costs of a business—with more competitive wages, pension plans, health benefits, etc. It is fair to assume that most companies that attempt to take the low-cost, no-frills approach to sales will be strongly avoiding unionization (look at WalMart, McDonalds, for more examples of this.) So how do you get employees to work for less and provide the same level of service? Through the philosophy that excellent customer service comes from taking excellent care of employees. I feel that that attitudes and intentions were likely to “put employees first”, however, it cannot simply be lip-service. Good intentions and upper-management attitudes don’t compensate for lack of security, the need for improved wage structures, and unsafe working conditions.
Question 3. Reflecting on the discussion regarding current management practices, explain the ways in which WestJet’s human resource practices resemble a high performance work system?
High performance work systems “often include rigorous recruitment and selection procedures, incentive-base compensation, intensive training and development, and reductions in pay and status differentials.” Ways In which WestJet’s HR practices resemble HPWS is in their incentive-based compensation. Prior to unionization, WestJet offered employees a generous profit-sharing so that they could benefit financially from the success of the company. This tactic hopes to instill a sense of ownership in each employee so that they are motivated toward company success. They also employed the technique of flatter hierarchies, avoiding class boundaries and having upper-management and pilots contributing toward lower-level duties, such as offloading baggage and tidying the plane between flights. Employees also had much autonomy and were encouraged to rely on their own intuition in problem-solving and guest compensation. There was also a non-union association called PACT, which was another proactive approach to handling employee concerns without the need for unionization. All these methods worked out for WestJet for 2 decades, but eventually, like everything in economics, there was a tipping point where employees began to push back.
Question 4. Do you think that a HPWS is enough to prevent a union from becoming established at a work place?
As of August 2018, WestJet has unionized. It started with the pilots, then the rest of the crew, and there were periods of hostility at the bargaining table. This is based on the fact that eventually, there will be a fundamental disagreement. You cannot please everyone all the time. Additionally, if the rest of the industry is unionized, and as non-union workers age and get to retirement years, this caused a shift in WestJet employee attitudes since the senior staff may not be protected like they expected, and this could cause an upheaval.
Like any economy, the ebbs and flows swing like a pendulum. All the way in one direction until a tipping point, and then all the way back the other way, and so on. When economic factors interfere, it can be hard to predict if any long-term arrangement will persist. Higher fuel prices, competition and disputes with pilots (WestJet was contracting out their work which was a huge issues, and they were growing unsettled that their contracts were not in-line with that of the rest of the industry) were the ultimate catalysts in WestJet going from one of the only non-unionized airlines in North America, to joining CUPE, a union for airline employees.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Honesty and Humanness

Case Study, HRM

Section from my Organizational Behaviour textbook